supabase-postgres-best-practices
references/conn-pooling.md
.md 42 lines
Content
---
title: Use Connection Pooling for All Applications
impact: CRITICAL
impactDescription: Handle 10-100x more concurrent users
tags: connection-pooling, pgbouncer, performance, scalability
---
## Use Connection Pooling for All Applications
Postgres connections are expensive (1-3MB RAM each). Without pooling, applications exhaust connections under load.
**Incorrect (new connection per request):**
```sql
-- Each request creates a new connection
-- Application code: db.connect() per request
-- Result: 500 concurrent users = 500 connections = crashed database
-- Check current connections
select count(*) from pg_stat_activity; -- 487 connections!
```
**Correct (connection pooling):**
```sql
-- Use a pooler like PgBouncer between app and database
-- Application connects to pooler, pooler reuses a small pool to Postgres
-- Configure pool_size based on: (CPU cores * 2) + spindle_count
-- Example for 4 cores: pool_size = 10
-- Result: 500 concurrent users share 10 actual connections
select count(*) from pg_stat_activity; -- 10 connections
```
Pool modes:
- **Transaction mode**: connection returned after each transaction (best for most apps)
- **Session mode**: connection held for entire session (needed for prepared statements, temp tables)
Reference: [Connection Pooling](https://supabase.com/docs/guides/database/connecting-to-postgres#connection-pooler)